Inver Grove Heights reviewed a proposed data center at 5842 Carmen Ave E and adopted an interim ordinance pausing construction or expansion of data centers.
Outcome: Interim ordinance adopted May 11, 2026, imposing a moratorium on construction or expansion of data centers in Inver Grove Heights, including the proposed Carmen Ave E project. Source: City of Inver Grove Heights official city update (ighmn.gov, accessed 2026-06-10). The official update confirms the Planning Commission review (April 7, 2026), City Council major site plan review (April 27, 2026), and ordinance adoption (May 11, 2026). Vote count and individual votes are not confirmed by an official roll-call source reviewed for this record. The moratorium status as of June 2026 and any June council deliberation outcome are not confirmed from an official source reviewed for this record.
- Business and Development
- Housing and Land Use
- Governance
- Residents
- Businesses
- Property Owners
What the official record shows
The proposed site (official city update)
The City of Inver Grove Heights published an official city update about the proposed data center. The update identifies the site as 5842 Carmen Ave E, the former Travel Tags site. The official city update says the site is about 50,000 square feet with anticipated five megawatts of power usage.
Source: City of Inver Grove Heights, official city update, published 2026-04-03. Read the official city update. Attribution limit: the update does not confirm the applicant entity name, final project dimensions, or post-ordinance status.
Review timeline (official city update)
- April 7, 2026: Planning Commission reviewed the application. Source: official city update.
- April 27, 2026: City Council reviewed the major site plan. Source: official city update.
- May 11, 2026: City Council adopted interim ordinance to study data centers and impose a moratorium on construction or expansion, including the proposed data center. Source: official city update.
Attribution limit: the official city update confirms these process dates. Vote counts and individual council member votes are not confirmed by an official roll-call source reviewed for this record. The moratorium status after May 11, 2026 is not confirmed by an official source reviewed for this record.
Local reporting context (labeled)
The following details are from local media reporting. They are not confirmed by an official source reviewed for this record.
- Local reporting (FOX 9, 2026-05-24) described the applicant as QLevr or a related entity and reported the applicant threatened legal action, arguing that state law protected its pending application.
- Local reporting (KSTP) reported the council held off on reconsidering the moratorium until June 2026.
- Local reporting (Star Tribune, 2026-03-23) described the project as 54,000 square feet and provided regional context about community concerns.
Attribution limit: local reporting is a secondary source. Applicant name, legal action, project dimensions from local reporting, and June reconsidering status should remain labeled as reported by local media unless agenda materials, official minutes, or a later city update confirm them.
Data quality notes
The official city update lists the site as approximately 50,000 square feet. Local reporting (Star Tribune and other sources) describes the project as 54,000 or 55,000 square feet. Use the official city update as the baseline for civic context. The local reporting figure should remain labeled as reported until agenda materials or final minutes confirm a specific dimension.
Local reporting references QLevr, T5, or related ownership or development entities. The official city update does not name the applicant. The applicant entity name should remain labeled as reported by local media until confirmed from an official agenda packet, planning application, or minutes.
The official city update confirms the May 11, 2026 ordinance adoption. Local reporting describes June council discussions about reconsidering the moratorium. The outcome of those discussions is not confirmed from an official source reviewed for this record. Check the IGH agendas and minutes page or the public notices page for the current moratorium status.
Source trail and source limits
Official sources
Primary source: Proposed Data Center Development - City of Inver Grove Heights, official city update, published 2026-04-03, accessed 2026-06-10
Local reporting (secondary sources)
Reported by local media: Inver Grove Heights City Council presses pause on reconsidering data center moratorium - KSTP, reported by local media, accessed 2026-06-10
Reported by local media: Inver Grove Heights threatened with legal action over planned data center - FOX 9, reported by local media, published 2026-05-24, accessed 2026-06-10
Reported by local media: Big data centers are raising alarm. Now residents are sweating the small ones, too. - Minnesota Star Tribune, reported by local media, published 2026-03-23, accessed 2026-06-10
What these sources do not prove
Source limit: The official city update is the baseline source for site description, process dates, and ordinance adoption. It does not confirm vote counts, individual votes, applicant entity details, or the outcome of June council deliberations. Local reporting details about project size (54,000 or 55,000 square feet in some reports), the applicant entity name (QLevr or related entities), threatened legal action, and June reconsidering discussions are reported context from local media. They should remain labeled as reported by local media unless agenda materials, official minutes, or a later city update confirm them. The moratorium status as of June 2026 needs final agenda packet, ordinance text, or minutes verification.
What residents can do next
- Read the official Inver Grove Heights city update on the proposed data center (official city update, accessed 2026-06-10).
- Review IGH agendas and minutes to find the April 7 Planning Commission packet, April 27 City Council major site plan review, and May 11 interim ordinance.
- Check the IGH public notices page for ordinance text.
- Contact the mayor or council.
- Attend a future City Council meeting.
- Submit a correction if a source confirms official vote counts, individual votes, the June deliberation outcome, or the final ordinance text.